Assessment criteria

From CILIP site http://www.cilip.org.uk/SiteCollectionDocuments/worddocs/qualificationschartership/MCLIPassess0502.doc

1.1 Does the application satisfactorily demonstrate the ability to reflect critically on personal performance? (The candidate should show that s/he has thought about their performance and ways in which it has been improved as a result of experience of ‘doing the job’ or undertaking a particular task or role.)                                

  •         personal statement, reflective writing to show how you implemented the evidence given                          

 

1.2 Does the application satisfactorily demonstrate the ability to evaluate service performance?  (The candidate should show that s/he is able evaluate the effectiveness of the library/information unit/s for which they work, or have worked, in meeting its/their aims and objectives.)

  • personal statement, reflective writing to show how you implemented the evidence given
                                                                                                                              

1.3. Does the application satisfactorily demonstrate active commitment to continuing professional development?         (The candidate should show how they have carried out their PPDP. There should be evidence of involvement in both formal and informal developmental activities e.g. employer’s training programme/s, courses, visits, reading, email discussion lists, participation in CILIP branches and groups.)            

  • PPDP, lists of training activities                                                                                                                          

1.4. Does the application satisfactorily demonstrate the ability to analyse personal and professional development as a result of formal and informal training and development activities?  (The candidate should show how their skills and knowledge have changed and their practice has been enhanced as a result of learning from formal and informal training and development activities.)   

  • personal statement, reflective writing to show how you implemented the evidence given                                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                 

1.5. Does the application satisfactorily demonstrate breadth of professional knowledge and understanding of the wider professional context? (The candidate should show that s/he he can think beyond the confines of their own job and is aware of issues which influence the wider profession)   

  • evidenced in personal statement, reading for development, supporting evidence
  • demonstrate have awareness of body of professional knowledge and how operates at work
Advertisements

One thought on “Assessment criteria

  1. Pingback: Chartership: key points from the Chartership Handbook « Librarian of tomorrow

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s